 |
|
| 1. In the text, we emphasized that the indefinite integral represents all antiderivatives of a given
function. To understand why this is important, consider a situation where you know the net force, F(t ) , acting on an object. By Newton's second law, F = ma. For the position
function s(t ) , this translates to a(t ) = s'' (t ) = F(t )/m. To compute s(t ) , you need to compute two antiderivatives of the force
function F(t )/m. But, suppose you were unable to find all antiderivatives. How would you know whether you had computed the antiderivative that corresponded to the position function? In physical terms, explain why it is reasonable to expect that there is only one antiderivative corresponding to a given set of initial conditions. |
| 2. In the text, we presented a one-dimensional model of a space shuttle flight. We ignored some of the forces on the shuttle so that the resulting mathematical equation would be one that we could solve. You may wonder what the benefit of doing this is. Weigh the relative worth of having an unsolvable but realistic model versus having a solution of a model that is only partially accurate. Keep in mind that when you toss trash into a wastebasket you do not take the curvature of the earth into account. |
| 3. Verify that and xex- ex+c by computing derivatives of the proposed antiderivatives. Which
derivative rules did you use? Why does this make it unlikely that we will find a general product (antiderivative) rule for ? |
| 4. We stated in the text that we do not yet have a formula for the antiderivative of several elementary functions, including ln x , sec x and csc x. Given a
function f (x) , explain what determines whether or not we have a simple formula for . For example, why is there a simple formula for but not ? |
| In exercises 5-40, find the general antiderivative.
|
| 5. | 6. |
| 7. | 8. |
| 9. | 10. |
| 11. | 12. |
| 13. | 14. |
| 15. | 16. |
| 17. | 18. |
| 19. | 20. |
| 21. | 22.
|
| 23. | 24. |
| 25. | 26. |
| 27. | 28. |
| 29. | 30. |
| 31. | 32. |
| 33. | 34. |
| 35. | 36. |
| 37. | 38. |
| 39. | 40.
|
| In exercises 41-52, 6 of the 12 antiderivatives can be determined using basic algebra and the
derivative formulas we have presented. Find the antiderivatives of those 6 and label the others N/A.
|
| 41. | 42. |
| 43. | 44. |
| 45. | 46. |
| 47. | 48. |
| 49. | 50. |
| 51. | 52.
|
| |
| 53. In
Example 1.12, use your CAS to evaluate the antiderivatives in parts (b) and (f). Verify that these are correct by evaluating derivatives. |
| 54. For each of the six problems in exercises 41-52 that you labeled N/A, try to find an antiderivative on your CAS. Where possible, verify that the antiderivative is correct by evaluating derivatives. |
| In exercises 55-60, find the
function f (x) satisfying the given conditions.
|
| |
| 55. f ' (x) = 4x2-1, f (0) = 2
|
| 56. f ' (x) = 4cos x, f (0) = 3
|
| 57. f ' (x) = 3ex+x, f (0) = 4
|
| 58. f ' (x) = 3sin 2x, f (0) = 1
|
| 59. f '' (x) = 12, f ' (0) = 2, f (0) = 3
|
| 60. f '' (x) = 2x, f ' (0) = -3, f (0) = 2
|
| In exercises 61-64, find all functions satisfying the given conditions.
|
| 61. f '' (x) = 3sin x+4x2 | 62. f '' (x) = -2cos x |
| 63. f '' ' (x) = 4-2/x3 | 64. f '' ' (x) = sin 2x-ex
|
| |
| 65. Determine the position
function if the velocity function is v(t ) = 3-12t and the initial position is s(0) = 3. |
| 66. Determine the position
function if the velocity function is v(t ) = 3e-t -2 and the initial position is s(0) = 0. |
| 67. Determine the position
function if the acceleration function is a(t ) = 3sin t+1 , the initial velocity is v(0) = 0 and the initial position is s(0) = 4. |
| 68. Determine the position
function if the acceleration function is a(t ) = t 2+1 , the initial velocity is v(0) = 4 and the initial position is s(0) = 0. |
| 69. Suppose that a car can accelerate from 30 mph to 50 mph in 4 seconds. Assuming a
constant acceleration, find the acceleration (in miles per second squared) of the car and find the
distance traveled by the car during the 4 seconds. |
| 70. Suppose that a car can come to rest from 60 mph in 3 seconds. Assuming a
constant (negative) acceleration, find the acceleration (in miles per second squared) of the car and find the
distance traveled by the car during the 3 seconds (i.e., the stopping distance). |
| In exercises 71 and 72, sketch the graph of a
function f (x) corresponding to the given graph of .
|
| |
| 71.
| 72.
|
| 73. Sketch the graphs of three functions with the
derivative, sketched in Exercise 71. |
| 74. Repeat exercise 71 if the given graph is of f '' (x). |
| 75. For the shuttle in
Example 1.13, find the time when it reaches the ground and its velocity at that time. Why did we say that this would be a disastrous outcome? |
| 76. Derive the formulas sec2xdx = tanx + c and = sec x + c. |
| 77. Derive the formulas and
|
| 78. Compute the derivatives of esin x and . Given these derivatives, evaluate the antiderivatives and . Next, evaluate . (Hint: .) Similarly, evaluate . In general, evaluate . Next, evaluate , and the more general . |
| As we have stated, there is not a general rule for the antiderivative of a product, . Instead, there are many special cases that you evaluate case by case. |
| 79. A differential equation is an equation involving an unknown
function and one or more of its derivatives, for instance, v' (t ) = 2t+3. To solve this
differential equation, you simply find the antiderivative t 2 + 3t+c. Notice that solutions of a
differential equation are functions. In general, differential equations can be challenging to solve. For example, we introduced the
differential equation v' (t ) = -mg + kv2(t ) for the vertical motion of a space shuttle subject to gravity and air drag. Taking specific values of m and k gives the equation v'(t ) = -32 + 0.0003v2(t ). To solve this, we would need to find a
function whose derivative equals -32 plus 0.0003 times the square of the
function. It is difficult to find a function whose derivative is written in terms of [v(t )]2 when v(t ) is precisely what is unknown. We can nonetheless construct a graphical representation of the solution using what is called a direction field. Suppose we want to construct a solution passing through the point (0, -100) , corresponding to an initial velocity of v(0) = -100 ft/s. With v = -100 , we know that the
slope of the solution is v' = -32 + 0.0003(-100)2 = - 29. Starting at (0, -100) , sketch in a short line segment with
slope -29. Such a line segment would connect to the point (1, -129) if you extended it that far (but make yours much shorter). At t = 1 and v = -129 , the
slope of the solution is v' = -32 + 0.0003(-129)2 -27. Sketch in a short line segment with
slope -27 starting at the point (1, -129). This line segment points to (2, -156). At this point, v' = -32 + 0.0003(-156)2 . Sketch in a short line segment with
slope -24.7 at (2, -156). Do you see a graphical solution starting to emerge? Is the solution increasing or decreasing?
concave up or concave down? If your CAS has a direction field capability, sketch the direction field and try to visualize the solution starting at points (0, -100), (0, 0) and (0, -300). |