|
 |
Over the last several sections, we have been steadily refining a model for the motion of a weight hanging from a spring. In
Section 2.5, we found that the cosine function could be used to describe the oscillations of the weight. In
Section 2.6, we found that if we combined this with an
exponential function, we could describe an oscillatory motion that gradually dies out. However, the model u(t ) = e-t cos t represents only one possible motion (specifically, one where the motion dies out quite rapidly).
| If we wanted to change the rate at which the motion dies out, we could change the
exponential function used. If we wanted to change the period of the oscillations, we could change the trigonometric function used. For example, u(t ) = e-t /6cos 4t describes a somewhat different motion (see
Figure 2.38).
This looks much more like the gradual dying out of a spring's motion that you might expect, compared to the motion shown in
Figure 2.36. Unfortunately, we do not presently have any rules for computing the derivative of the composition function e-t /6.
|
Figure 2.38

u = e-t /6 cos 4t and u = e-t cos t |
Recall that in Example 5.2, we used the product rule to show
that
Using this result and the product rule, notice that
| |
| | = cos xsin2 x+sin x(2sin xcos x) | |
| | = 3sin2 xcos x. |
|
We leave it as a straightforward exercise to extend this result to
You should notice that in each case, we have brought the exponent down, lowered the power by one and then multiplied by the
derivative of sin x. Notice that we can write sin 4x
as the composite function
sin 4x = (sin x) 4 = f (g(x)),
where g(x) = sin x and f (x) = x4. Differentiating f and g, we have f '(x) = 4x3 and g'(x) = cos x. It's now easy to see that 4sin3x = f '(g(x)). Finally, observe that the
derivative of the composite function is
This is an example of the chain rule, which has the following general form. |
 |
|
 |
It is often helpful to think of the chain rule in Leibniz notation. If y = f (u) and u = g(x), then y = f (g(x)) and the chain rule says that|
| (7.1) |
|
 |
|
 |
Differentiate y = (x3+x-1)5.
|
 |
|
 |
For u = x3+x-1, note that y = u5. From (7.1), we have
| | Since y = u5. |
| | |
| | = 5(x3+x-1)4(3x2+1). |
|
The last term is the derivative of the expression inside the parentheses (often referred to as the derivative of the inside). |
 |
|
 |
|
Using the Chain Rule for an Exponential Function |
|
 |
Find
|
 |
|
 |
Let u = -t /6. Then, from (7.1),
Notice that here, the derivative of the inside is the derivative of the exponent. |
 |
|
 |
|
Finding the Velocity of a Hanging Weight |
|
 |
Suppose the position of a weight hanging from a spring is given by u(t ) = e-t /6cos 4t. Find the velocity of the weight at any time t.
|
 |
|
 |
Using the product rule and the chain rule, we have
| v(t ) | | By the product rule. |
| | | By the chain rule. |
| | |
| | = - e-t /6cos 4t-4e-t /6sin 4t. |
| |
 |
|

 |
You are now in a position to calculate the derivative of virtually every function you can write down, by using the rules we have at our disposal. In many cases, the chain rule must be combined with other
differentiation rules. |
 |
|
A Derivative Involving a Chain Rule and a Quotient Rule |
|
 |
Find the derivative of
|
 |
|
 |
We have
| f '(x) | | By the chain rule. |
| | | By the quotient rule. |
| | |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
A Derivative Involving a Quotient Rule and Several Chain Rules |
|
 |
Find the derivative of
|
 |
|
 |
We have
| f '(x) | |
| By the quotient rule. |
| | |
| By the chain rule. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
 |
|
 |
|
A Derivative Involving Repeated Chain Rules |
|
 |
Find the derivative of
|
 |
|
 |
You can think of the chain rule here as differentiating from the outside-in, where we illustrate the process one step at a time, as follows: |
 |
|
 |
Next, we consider a simple application. |
 |
|
Finding the Maximum Concentration of a Chemical |
|
 |
The concentration x of a certain chemical after t seconds of an
autocatalytic reaction is given by Show that x'(t ) > 0 and use this information to determine that the concentration of the chemical never exceeds 10.
|
 |
|
 |
Before computing the derivative, look carefully at the function x(t ). The
independent variable is t and the only term involving t is in the denominator. So, we don't need to use the quotient rule. Instead, first rewrite the function as x(t ) = 10(9e-20 t +1)-1 and use the chain rule. We get
| x'(t ) | |
| | = -10(9e-20 t +1)-2(-180e-20t ) |
| | = 1800e-20t (9e-20t +1)-2 |
| | |
|
|
 |
|
|